Session

Back to Programme Overview

Ureteroscopy: Clinical outcomes

Poster Session 25

  • Location:
    Room London, North Hall (Level 1)
  • Chairs:
     S.D. Kim, Busan (KR)
     K.A. Mohd Ghani, Kuala Lumpur (MY)
     G-H. Zeng, Guangzhou (CN)
  • Aims and objectives of this session

    Retrograde intrarenal stone surgery became easier with the availability of new technologies. Have we reached 100% stone-free rate?

  • Poster viewing of 20 minutes. Presentations will take place on stage. Standard presentations are 2 minutes in length, followed by 2 minutes for discussion.
328
To determine the frequency of stone free rates in patients undergoing ureterorenoscopy using S.T.O.N.E score

By: Younis M.A., Khan N., Ather M.H.

Institutes: Aga Khan University Hospital, Dept. of Surgery, Karachi, Pakistan

329
ScorDiS-RIRS: A proposal for a new scoring system to predict difficult retrograde intra-renal surgery for renal stones

By: Dal Moro F., Beltrami P., Mandato F.G., Bettin L., Borso C., Iafrate M., Ruggera L., Zattoni F.

Institutes: University of Padua, Dept. of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology – Urology, Padua, Italy

330
External validation of Imamura nomogram as preoperative predictive system for semi-rigid ureterolithotripsy outcomes

By: De Nunzio C.1, Bellangino M.1, Voglino O.A.1, Baldassarri V.1, Presicce F.1, Pignatelli M.2, Tema G.1, Berardi E.2, Cremona A.2, Tubaro A.1

Institutes: 1Sant’ Andrea Hospital – Sapienza University, Dept. of Urology, Rome, Italy, 2Sant’ Andrea Hospital – Sapienza University, Dept. of Radiology, Rome, Italy

331
Tailoring antibiotic prophylaxis for ureteroscopic procedures based on local resistance profiles may lead to reduced rates of infections and urosepsis

By: Zisman A., Badaan S., Kastin A., Kravtsov A., Kakiashvili D., Amiel G., Mullerad M.

Institutes: Rambam Health Care Campus, Technion Faculty of Medicine, Dept. of Urology, Haifa, Israel

332
Impact of preoperative α-adrenergic antagonists on ureteral access sheath insertion force and the upper limit of force to avoid ureteral mucosal injury: A randomized-controlled study

By: Koo K.C.1, Lee D.H.3, Yoon J.H.2, Park N.-C.2, Lee K.S.1, Kim D.K.1, Kim J.C.1, Oh K.T.1, Heo J.E.1, Cho K.S.1, Hong C.H.1, Chung B.H.1

Institutes: 1Yonsei University College of Medicine, Dept. of Urology, Seoul, South Korea, 2Yonsei University, School of Mechanical Engineering, Seoul, South Korea, 3Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University College of Medicine, Dept. of Urology, Pusan, South Korea

333
Preoperative ureteral wall thickness predicts the presence of impacted stone in patients with ureteral stone undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy

By: Takashi Y.1, Inoue T.2, Murota T.2, Kinoshita H.2, Matsuda T.2

Institutes: 1Kansai Medical University, Dept. of Urology and Andrology, Hirakata, Japan, 2Kansai Medical University, Dept. of Urology and Andrology, Osaka, Japan

334
Use of post-ureteroscopy lesion scale for the evaluation of ureteral damage: Does it need a learning curve?

By: Polo Hernández R.1, Caballero Romeu J.P.1, Galán Llopis J.A.2, Soria F.3, Caballero Pérez P.4, Morcillo Martín E.3, De La Cruz Conty J.3, Garcés Valverde M.1, Romero Maroto J.5

Institutes: 1Fisabio-Isabial, Dept. of Urology, Alicante, Spain, 2Universitary Hospital of Vinalopó, Dept. of Urology, Alicante, Spain, 3Jesús Usón Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre – Endoscopy Unit, Dept. of Urology, Cáceres, Spain, 4University of Alicante, Dept. of Community Nursing, Preventive Medicine and Public Health and History, Alicante, Spain, 5University Clinical Hospital of San Juan, Dept. of Urology, Alicante, Spain

335
Preliminary results of a prospective randomized trial of safety guidewire use in ureteroscopic stone surgery: To use or not to use

By: Tanidir Y., Bahadir S., Sener T.E., Sulukaya M., Sekerci C.A., Tinay I., Simsek F.

Institutes: Marmara University School of Medicine, Dept. of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey

336
Lithiasic size estimation according to the image technique

By: Parra-López M., Antón-Eguía B.T., Argüelles-Salido E., Campoy-Martínez P., Medina-López R.A.

Institutes: Virgen Del Rocío University Hospital. Seville Biomedicine Institute (ibis)., Dept. of Urology and Nephrology., Seville, Spain

337
Effects of flexible ureteroscopy on renal blood flow

By: Şener T.E.1, Bin Hamri S.2, Sever I.H.3, Ozdemir B.3, Tanidir Y.1, Traxer O.4

Institutes: 1Marmara University School of Medicine, Dept. of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey, 2King Abdulaziz National Guard Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 3Marmara University School of Medicine, Dept. of Radiology, Istanbul, Turkey, 4Pierre & Marie Curie University, Tenon University Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Paris, France

338
Secondary signs on preoperative CT as predictive factors of febrile urinary tract infection

By: Lee J.N., Lee Y.J., Chung J-W., Ha Y-S., Choi S.H., Kim B.S., Kim H.T., Kim T-H., Yoo E.S., Kwon T.G., Chung S.K., Kim B.W.

Institutes: Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Dept. of Urology, Daegu, South Korea

339
A prospective, observational study to investigate change of separate renal function in patients who underwent minimally invasive renal stone surgery according to the preoperative differential renal function

By: Choo M.S.1, Ryu K.H.3, Park J.2, Cho M.C.2, Son H.2, Jeong H.2, Cho S.Y.2

Institutes: 1Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Hwaseong-Si, South Korea, 2SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Dept. of Urology, Seoul, South Korea, 3Gwangmyeong Sungae Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Gwangmyeong-City, South Korea

340
Endoscopic recognition of kidney lithiasis: Validation of first intra-operative imaging

By: Estrade V.1, Benmeziani R.1, Jour I.2, Daudon M.3, Traxer O.4

Institutes: 1Centre Hospitalier d’Angoulême, Dept. of Urology, Angouleme, France, 2Lister Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Stevenage, United Kingdom, 3Hopitaux Universitaires Est Parisien Tenon, Multidisciplinary Functional Explorations, Paris, France, 4Hopitaux Universitaires Est Parisien Tenon, Dept. of Urology, Paris, France

341
Retrograde intrarenal surgery in the elderly: Is it feasible and safe?

By: Berardinelli F.1, De Francesco P.1, Marchioni M.1, Cera N.2, Proietti S.3, Hennessey D.4, Dalpiaz O.5, Cracco C.6, Scoffone C.6, Giusti G.3, Cindolo L.1, Schips L.1

Institutes: 1S. Pio Da Pietrelcina Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Vasto, Italy, 2University of Porto, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Porto, Portugal, 3Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Ville Turro Division, Dept. of Urology, Milan, Italy, 4Austin Health, Dept. of Urology, Melbourne, Australia, 5Medizinische Universität Graz, Urologische Klinik, Graz, Austria, 6Ospedale Cottolengo, Dept. of Urology, Turin, Italy

342
Secondary intervention due to symptomatic ureteral stones is not necessary in the majority of patients after previous stenting

By: Stojkova E., Moltzahn F., Burkhard F., Thalmann G., Roth B.

Institutes: University Hospital Bern, Dept. of Urology, Bern, Switzerland

343
Expanding the limits of the use of the Avicenna Roboflex URS-robot: Update of the clinical results of the European Avicenna Roboflex Group

By: Klein J-T.1, Fiedler M.2, Charlampogianis N.2, Rieker P.2, Sälzler N.2, Scheitlin W.2, Kabakci S.3, Saglam R.4, Rassweiler J.2

Institutes: 1Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Dept. of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Ulm, Germany, 2SLK-Klinikum GmbH, Dept. of Urology, Heilbronn, Germany, 3Elmed, Medical Department, Ankara, Turkey, 4Medicana International, Dept. of Urology, Ankara, Turkey