Session

Back to Programme Overview

Complex conditions for urogenital reconstructions

Poster Session 21

  • Location:
    Room Madrid, North Hall (Level 1)
  • Chairs:
     R. Djinovic, Belgrade (RS)
     N. Watkin, London (GB)
  • Aims and objectives of this session

    This poster session presents complex conditions in reconstructive patient care.

  • Poster viewing of 20 minutes. Presentations will take place on stage. Standard presentations are 2 minutes in length, followed by 2 minutes for discussion.
275
Open repair of bladder neck contractures (BNC) with or without adjuvant radiotherapy – our experience in 42 patients

By: Ivaz S., Bugeja S., Frost A., Dragova M., Andrich D., Mundy A.

Institutes: UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, Dept. of Urology, London, United Kingdom

276
The T-plasty as a modified YV-plasty for the treatment of highly recurrent bladder neck stenosis: High success and patient satisfaction rates

By: Rosenbaum C., Reiss P., Engel O., Kluth L., Fisch M., Dahlem R.

Institutes: Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Dept. of Urology, Hamburg, Germany

277
The effect of radiotherapy on the outcome of the repair of urorectal fistulae

By: Ivaz S., Frost A., Dragova M., Bugeja S., Andrich D., Mundy A.

Institutes: UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, Dept. of Reconstructive Urology, London, United Kingdom

278
The longer-term results of non-transecting bulbar urethroplasty

By: Frost A., Ivaz S., Bugeja S., Dragova M., Andrich D., Mundy A.

Institutes: UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, Dept. of Reconstructive Urology, London, United Kingdom

279
Comparative assessment of postoperative erectile function and quality of life in male one-stage onlay vs. inlay buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty

By: Vetterlein M., Rosenbaum C., Gild P., Meyer C., Ludwig T., Gödde A., Aziz A., Engel O., Dahlem R., Fisch M., Kluth L.

Institutes: University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Dept. of Urology, Hamburg, Germany

280
Re-do urethroplasty after unsuccessful urethral reconstruction with buccal mucosa graft

By: Pandey A., Borisenkov M., Barta-Kelemen A., Keller H.

Institutes: Sana Klinikum Hof GmbH, Dept. of Urology, Hof, Germany

281
Characteristics and predictors of complications after urethroplasty: Effect of operative duration, length of stay, and use of tissue transfer

By: Lacy J.2, Dugan A.3, Gupta S.1

Institutes: 1University of Kentucky, Dept. of Urology, Lexington, United States of America, 2University of Tennessee, Dept. of Urology, Knoxville, United States of America, 3University of Kentucky, Dept. of Surgery, Lexington, United States of America

282
UREThRAL Stricture Score can predict surgical outcome of urethral reconstruction in patients with anterior urethral stricture

By: Mitsui Y., Tamura K., Tai T., Nagata M., Yamabe F., Suzuki K., Kobayashi H., Nakajima K., Nagao K.

Institutes: Toho University Faculty Of Medicine, Dept. of Urology, Ohta, Japan

283
Surgical outcomes of primary and recurrent female urethral diverticula

By: Ko K.J.1, Chung H.W.1, Lee C.U.1, Na J.P.1, Sung H.H.1, Choi S.M.2, Lee K-S.1

Institutes: 1Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Dept. of Urology, Seoul, South Korea, 2Gyeonsang National University H, Dept. of Urology, Jinju, South Korea

284
Midterm follow up of patients performed fold-back perineoscrotal flap plus penile inversion vaginoplasty for male-to-female gender reassignment surgery

By: Tavakkoli Tabassi K., Ghoreifi A., Hosseini E., Eghtesadi M., Moradian S.

Institutes: Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Dept. of Urology, Mashhad, Iran

285
Evaluation of success rate, functional outcome, comorbidity and quality of life in patients with one-stage ventral onlay buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty for urethral stricture disease after radiotherapy using a validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM)

By: Körner-Riffard K., Gild P., Vetterlein M., Rosenbaum C., Loewe C., Dahlem R., Fisch M., Kluth L.

Institutes: University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Dept. of Urology, Hamburg, Germany

286
Prospective patient-centred evaluation of urethroplasty using a patient reported outcome measure

By: Chawla A.1, Kapadia A.2, Hegde P.2

Institutes: 1Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Dept. of Urology and Renal Transplant, Manipal, India, 2Kasturba Medical College Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Manipal, India

287
De novo penile deviation after urethroplasty with oral mucosa: A relevant problem?

By: Pandey A., Raita C., Beier J.

Institutes: Sana Klinikum Hof GmbH, Dept. of Urology, Hof, Germany

288
Evaluation of the single-incision system to treat pelvic organ prolapse: Follow-up from 24 to 96 months of first 178 patients

By: Castroviejo Royo F.1, Martinez-Sagara Oceja J.M.1, Conde Redondo C.1, Rodríguez Toves L.A.1, Gonzalez Tejero C.2, Marina García Tuñón C.2, Tapia Herrero A.1, García Viña A.1, Poza Del Val M.1, Miralles Ayuso S.1

Institutes: 1Rio Hortega University Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Valladolid, Spain, 2Rio Hortega University Hospital, Dept. of Gynecology, Valladolid, Spain

289
Collagen cell carrier for urethral reconstructive surgery: First results of a long-term minipig model

By: Aufderklamm S.1, Kelp A.1, Maurer S.1, Gustafsson L.1, Busch S.2, Vaegler M.3, Stenzl A.1, Sievert K-D.1, Amend B.1

Institutes: 1Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Dept. of Urology, Tübingen, Germany, 2Viscofan, BioEngineering, Weinheim, Germany, 3University Clinic Charitè, Experimental and Clinical Research Center (ECRC), Berlin, Germany