Session

Tailored stone treatment

Poster Session 31

  • Location:
    Room Paris, North Hall (Level 1)
  • Chairs:
     E. Montanari, Milan (IT)
     P.J.S. Osther, Fredericia (DK)
     A. Petřík, Ceske Budejovice (CZ)
  • Aims and objectives of this session

    ESWL, ureteroscopy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy or even laparoscopy? A tailored, individualized treatment plan should be the aim, although all modalities can be used for most stones.

  • Poster viewing of 20 minutes. Presentations will take place on stage. Standard presentations are 2 minutes in length, followed by 2 minutes for discussion.
407
Asymptomatic renal stones: Long term follow up from a tertiary hospital

By: Darrad M., Agyei M., Yallappa S., Subramonian K.

Institutes: Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Birmingham, United Kingdom

408
Follow-up care after ED visits for kidney stones — a missed opportunity

By: Hollingsworth J., Yan P.L., Hollenbeck B.K., Ghani K.R.

Institutes: University of Michigan, Dept. of Urology, Ann Arbor, United States of America

409
Acute renal colic, urinary tract infection and leucocytosis – is there any relationship? A prospective trial

By: Schnabel M.J., Rosenhammer B., Fritsche H.-M.

Institutes: Caritas Krankenhaus St. Josef, University of Regensburg, Dept. of Urology, Regensburg, Germany

410
A multi-centre cohort study evaluating the role of inflammatory markers in patient’s presenting with acute ureteric colic (MIMIC)

By: Shah T.1, O’Keefe A.2, Gao C.1, Manning T.1, Peacocke A.1, Cashman S.1, Shakir T.1, Nambiar A.1, Lamb B.1, Cumberbatch M.1, Pickard R.3, Erotocritou P.4, Smith D.5, Kasivisvanathan V.1

Institutes: 1British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training, Dept. of Urology, London, United Kingdom, 2University College London, Dept. of Statistical Science, London, United Kingdom, 3Newcastle University, Dept. of Urology, Newcastle, United Kingdom, 4Whittington Hospital, Dept. of Urology, London, United Kingdom, 5University College London Hospital, Dept. of Urology, London, United Kingdom

411
Oral dissolution therapy (ODT) for lucent renal calculi; can we predict the outcome?

By: Elsawy A., Elshal A., El-Nahas A., Abdel-Basset M., Farag H., Shokeir A.

Institutes: Mansoura University, Dept. of Urology, Mansoura, Egypt

412
Day-case ureteroscopy (DC-URS) for stone disease: Outcomes from an university hospital

By: Ghosh A.1, Oliver R.1, Way C.2, White L.2, Somani B.1

Institutes: 1University Hospital Southampton NHS FT, Dept. of Urology, Southampton, United Kingdom, 2University Hospital Southampton NHS FT, Dept. of Anaesthesiology, Southampton, United Kingdom

413
Comparison of success and complication rates between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and flexible ureterorenoscopy (URS) for untreated renal calculi

By: Fankhauser C.1, Hermanns T.1, Lieger L.1, Diethelm O.1, Müntener M.2, Umbehr M.2, Luginbühl T.3, Sulser T.1, Poyet C.1

Institutes: 1University Hospital, University of Zurich, Dept. of Urology, Zurich, Switzerland, 2City Hospital Triemli of Zurich, Dept. of Urology, Zurich, Switzerland, 3Spital Uster, Dept. of Urology, Uster, Switzerland

414
Ureteroscopy in pregnant women with complicated colic pain: A two center-matched retrospective study

By: Butticè S.2, Şener T.E.1, Laganà A.S.3, Vitale S.G.3, Netsch C.4, Tanidir Y.1, Pappalardo R.2, Magno C.2

Institutes: 1Marmara University School of Medicine, Dept. of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey, 2University of Messina, Dept. of Human Pathology, Section of Urology, Messina, Italy, 3University of Messina, Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Human Pathology In Adulthood and Childhood “G. Barresi”, Messina, Italy, 4Asklepios Hospital Barmbek, Dept. of Urology, Hamburg, Germany

415
Comparison of three surgical modalities for 20-25mm size lower pole stones: Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) vs mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) vs. percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), which is preferred?

By: Choi J.Y., Ko Y.H., Song P.H., Moon K.H., Jung H.C.

Institutes: Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Dept. of Urology, Daegu, South Korea

416
Retrograde intrarenal surgery and micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal lithiasis smaller than 2 cm

By: Cepeda M., Amón J.H., Mainez J.A., De La Cruz B., Rodríguez V., Poza M., Alonso D., Martínez-Sagarra J.M.

Institutes: Río Hortega University Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Valladolid, Spain

417
Transperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy vs. percutaneous antegrade ureteroscopy in the treatment of large proximal ureteral calculi: A prospective randomized comparative study

By: El Harrech Y., Abaka N., Ghoundale O., Touiti D.

Institutes: Military Hospital Avicenne, Dept. of Urology, Marrakech, Morocco

418
Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy versus semi rigid URS with laser lithotripsy in management of upper ureteric stone 2 cm or more: A prospective comparative study

By: Sakr A., Omran M., Fawzi A.., Desoky E., Youssef M., Seleem M., Elgalaly H., Eliwa A., Ragab A., Elkady E.

Institutes: Zagazig University Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Zagazig, Egypt

419
Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal pelvis stones in horseshoe kidneys: A prospective randomized study

By: Fawzi A.M., Sakr A., Eliwa A., Omran M., Youssef M., Desoky E., Seleem M.

Institutes: Zagazig University, Dept. of Urology, Zagazig, Egypt

420
Live surgical demonstrations do not compromise patients safety: Results from a 5 year experience in 151 urinary stone cases

By: Zanetti S.P.1, Legemate J.2, Kamphuis G.2, Baard J.2, Montanari E.1, Traxer O.3, De La Rosette J.2

Institutes: 1Fondazione Irccs Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Dept. of Urology, Milan, Italy, 2AMC Academic Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 3Hôpital Tenon, Dept. of Urology, Paris, France

421
The usefulness of limited field low-dose noncontrast computerized tomography for monitoring ureteral stones

By: Cho D.S.1, Kim S.I.2, Kim S.J.2

Institutes: 1Bundang Jesaeng General Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Seongnam, South Korea, 2Ajou University School of Medicine, Dept. of Urology, Suwon, South Korea

423
What are the benefits and harms of ureteroscopy (URS) compared with shock-wave lithotripsy (SWL) in the treatment of upper ureteral stones: A systematic review

By: Drake T.1, Grivas N.2, Dabestani S.3, Knoll T.4, Lamm T.B.5, Maclennan S.6, Aleš A.7, Skolarikos A.8, Straub M.9, Türk C.10, Yuhong Yuan C.11, Sarica K.12

Institutes: 1Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Bournemouth, United Kingdom, 2Hatzikosta General Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Ioannina, Greece, 3Skåne University Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Malmö, Sweden, 4Sindelfingen-Böblingen Medical Center, University of Tübingen, Dept. of Urology, Sindelfingen, Germany, 5University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Dept. of Urology, Aberdeen, United Kingdom, 6University of Aberdeen, Academic Urology Unit, Aberdeen, United Kingdom, 7Region Hospital, Dept. of Urology, České Budějovice, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Dept. of Urology, Prague, Czech Republic, 8Sismanoglio Hospital, Athens Medical School, Second Dept. of Urology, Athens, Greece, 9Technical University Munich, Dept. of Urology, Munich, Germany, 10Urologische Praxis und Steinzentrum, , Vienna, Austria, 11McMaster University, Dept. of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hamilton, Canada, 12Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Research and Training Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Istanbul, Turkey